Developed by the psychoanalyst Alfred Adler in the 1920s, birth order theory posits that a child’s ordinal position within their family impacts personality.
[1]
Adler believed family dynamics, parental attention, and sibling-role differentiation shape character traits and life trajectories — a theory that has gained mainstream prominence.
[1]
“Over time, birth order theory became popular in cultural psychology and parenting literature, though its scientific standing has been debated for decades,” Dr. Patel says.
While most experts agree that birth order is one of many factors that contribute to personality, here’s what the theory suggests about its influence.
Firstborn Personality Traits
Birth order theory traditionally links firstborn children with certain attributes, such as being:
[1]
- High-achieving
- Competitive
- A perfectionist
- Responsible
- Confident
- A leader
- Bossy
- Stubborn
For firstborns, a significant life event is the arrival of a sibling, when the caregiver’s attention shifts dramatically, notes Stefan Schmukle, PhD, a psychology professor at the University of Leipzig in Germany who has published research on the birth order theory and related topics.
“According to Adler, firstborns are ‘dethroned’ when a second child comes along, and this loss of perceived privilege and primacy may have a lasting influence on them,” Dr. Schmukle explains.
Still, receiving extra parental attention early in life might help firstborns to thrive intellectually. Some studies have found that this group typically scores higher on intelligence exams than younger siblings.
[3]
Middle-Child Personality Traits
Being born between an older and younger sibling is commonly associated with “peacemaker”-type traits, including being:
[1]
- A mediator
- Agreeable
- Diplomatic
- Independent
- Realistic
“Middle children are usually more diplomatic; sometimes they feel like the forgotten child and are more independent, or more able to be team players,” says Gabrielle Shapiro, MD, a general, child, and adolescent psychiatrist and a professor at New York City’s Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
For example, research conducted by Kibeom Lee, PhD, a psychology professor at the University of Calgary in Alberta, found that middle-borns scored highest on cooperation-related personality traits, like honesty, humility, and agreeableness. But this may be related to sibship size (the number of siblings growing up together) more than birth order, which appeared to contribute only small differences. While middles scored slightly higher on cooperation traits than youngest siblings, and significantly higher than firstborns and only children, the number of siblings a person had showed a stronger link to cooperative personality traits. This suggests that the effect was likely more about being part of a larger sibling group than about the actual birth-order ranking.
[4]
With this in mind, cooperative traits may be particularly applicable to middle children, who are by default part of families with at least three children. “We suspect that growing up with more siblings fosters cooperation, leading to a modestly more cooperative personality,” Dr. Lee says.
Youngest-Child Personality Traits
Known as the “babies” of the family, youngest children are often associated with being:
[1]
- Freethinking
- Rebellious
- Extroverted
- Outgoing
- Attention-seeking
- Social
According to the theory, these extraversion-related traits associated with last-born children could stem from parents becoming more laid-back in their approach by the time they have their youngest.
[1]
“Younger siblings may model older siblings’ behaviors or benefit from a more relaxed parenting environment, which can shape social behavior without reflecting innate personality differences,” Patel says.
Only-Child Personality Traits
Similar to firstborns, only children are categorized within birth order theory as being:
[1]
- Mature
- Perfectionist
- Confident
- Self-entertaining
- Detail-oriented
According to Adler’s theory, only children may be more comfortable interacting with adults, given the dedicated caregiver time and attention, and some may perceive them as less cooperative, for example, in social scenarios like the workplace.
[5]
But it all depends on the context in which they grow up, Dr. Shapiro says.Despite the anecdotal theory that not having to share resources may give only children an advantage in some areas, available research generally points to more similarities than differences in cognitive and social-behavioral development between these and other sibling types.
[6]
[7]
For example, a United Kingdom–based cohort analysis that examined groups of children over several decades (those born in 1946, 1958, 1970, and 2000–2002) found that only children tend to have cognitive abilities comparable to those from two-sibling families and higher cognitive scores than those from two-or-more-sibling families. But the so-called only-child advantage appeared to diminish with more recent generations (people born in 2001). The researchers suggest that family background factors, rather than birth order, are more likely to account for any contrast between only children and those from other sibling rankings.
[8]
“Outcomes depend far more on parenting quality, peer exposure, and social opportunities than on sibling absences,” Patel adds.
[8]
